Peterson v. Alabama Department of Corrections, State of et al
| Eric Jermaine Peterson |
| Alabama Department of Corrections, State of and Jefferson Dunn |
| 5:2019cv00920 |
| June 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing and under oath within fifteen (15) days, why the Court should not dismiss this action for failure to pay the Initial Partial Filing Fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/1/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM filed by Eric Jermaine Peterson. (KAM) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee of $27.53, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days,.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 6/26/2019. (KAM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Eric Jermaine Peterson. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Alabama Department of Corrections, State of, Jefferson Dunn, filed by Eric Jermaine Peterson.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
