Smith v. Kidd et al
| Courtney Smith |
| Ashley Kidd and Sgt. Pattson |
| 5:2019cv01140 |
| July 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION For the foregoing reasons, the magistrate judge RECOMMENDS that the plaintiff's motion to transfer be GRANTED and this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Signed by Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/29/2019. (PSM). Modified to correct Judge's name on 9/10/2019 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Transfer Case to the Southern District of Alabama by Courtney Smith. (JLC) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within twenty (20) days of the entry date of this order, the undersigned ORDERS the plaintiff to show cause in writing why the court should not transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/14/2019. (PSM)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Courtney Smith. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ashley Kidd, Sgt. Pattson, filed by Courtney Smith.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
