Grant v. Office of the Secretary of Defense et al
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Defendant: Missile Defense Agency, Office of the Secretary of Defense and State of Illinois
Case Number: 5:2019cv01566
Filed: September 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Liles C Burke
Referring Judge: Herman N Johnson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE that in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion entered contemporaneously herein the court DISMISSES this action with prejudice for failing to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 10/4/2019. (AHI)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION that the #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failing to state a claim on which relief can be granted as more fully set out in order. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 10/4/2019. (AHI)
October 4, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT: This civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Liles C. Burke. Please use case number 5:19-cv-1566-LCB on all subsequent pleadings. Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr. is no longer assigned to the case. (BJL)
October 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REASSIGNMENT ORDER: the undersigned DIRECTS the Clerk to reassign the case to a District Judge for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 10/4/19. (BJL)
September 20, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL)
September 20, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 9/20/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by William Lee Grant, II. (BJL)
September 20, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Missile Defense Agency, Office of the Secretary of Defense, and State of Illinois filed by William Lee Grant, II.(BJL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Grant v. Office of the Secretary of Defense et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missile Defense Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Office of the Secretary of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Lee Grant, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?