Daniel et al v. 3M Company Inc
| Mildred Gholston, Linda Cockrell, Mary Galindo, Robert Eaton, Amy McMahan, Huston Terry, Cindy Daniel and Edgar Izquierdo |
| 3M Company Inc |
| 5:2020cv00507 |
| April 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Applebaum, Virginia) |
Filing 4
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 4/17/2020. (AHI)
|
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M Company Inc. filed by 3M Company Inc (Martin, Zachary) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by 3M Company Inc.(Martin, Zachary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND IN COMPLAINT by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Lawrence County, Alabama, case number 42-CV-2020-900021 filed by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(AHI) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3573698 (receipt number B4601105417). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND IN COMPLAINT by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Lawrence County, Alabama, case number 42-CV-2020-900021 filed by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(AHI). (Martin, Zachary) Modified on 4/16/2020 (BJL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
