Smithey v. Frost-Arnett Company
Tina Smithey |
Frost-Arnett Company |
5:2020cv01639 |
October 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to either party. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 12/3/20. (BJL) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Tina Smithey (Philipps, David) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement, the court STAYS all current deadlines until December 31, 2020. The parties shall take appropriate action to perfect settlement by December 31, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/17/2020. (BJL) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Tina Smithey of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed - Frost-Arnett Company served on 11/4/2020, answer due 11/25/2020. (BJL) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Frost-Arnett Company. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Tina Smithey (Sykstus, Ronald) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 10/21/20. (BJL) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps Motion is RIPE 10/20/2020. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tina Smithey. (BJL) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tina Smithey. (BJL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Frost-Arnett Company filed by Tina Smithey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(BJL) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3697723 (B4601109192). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Frost-Arnett Company filed by Tina Smithey. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(BJL). (Philipps, David) Modified on 10/22/2020 (BJL). |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3697735 (B4601109194). (Philipps, David) Modified on 10/22/2020 (BJL). |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3697729 (B4601109193). (Philipps, David) Modified on 10/22/2020 (BJL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smithey v. Frost-Arnett Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Frost-Arnett Company | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tina Smithey | |
Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.