Carthen v. City of Huntsville
Charita M. Carthen |
City of Huntsville and The City of Huntsville |
5:2020cv01812 |
November 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Liles C Burke |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 REPLY Brief filed by Defendant City of Huntsville re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Huntsville. (Canupp, David) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Charita M. Carthen. (Campbell, John) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion to Stay. This case is STAYED pending ruling on the defendant's motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/11/2020. (KBW) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Stay by City of Huntsville. (Canupp, David) |
Filing 6 Brief re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Huntsville. (Canupp, David) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Huntsville. (Canupp, David) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed City of Huntsville served on 11/18/2020, answer due 12/9/2020. (AHI) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to City of Huntsville. (AHI) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Charita M. Carthen. (AHI) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against City of Huntsville filed by Charita M. Carthen.(AHI ) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number H4601004640 (AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.