Young v. Publix Super Markets Inc
| Tinia Young |
| Publix Super Markets Inc |
| 5:2020cv01972 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER-Certain time limits apply as set out herein. Objection to Mediation by September 28, 2021; Discovery due by November 5, 2021; Dispositive Motions due by November 19,2021. Final Pretrial Conference set for April 12,2022 at 09:30 AM in Hugo L Black US Courthouse, Birmingham, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Jury Trial set for May 23,2022 09:00 AM in US Post Office & Courthouse, Decatur, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 02/10/2021. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 5
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Keith, Travis)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3738699 (ALND receipt# B4601110369). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Publix Super Markets Inc from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 47-cv-2020-901078, filed by Publix Super Markets Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F) (MEB2). (Keith, Travis) Modified on 12/21/2020 (AKD).
|
|
Filing 4
ALND UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS reminding parties of their obligations under FRCP26(f) - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 12/14/2020. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL- Rule 26 Meeting Report due by February 11,2021; Pretrial Conference set for April 12, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. in 4A Jury Assembly Room in Birmingham AL at the Hugo L. Black Courthouse; Jury Trial set for May 23,2022 at 09:00 AM in US Post Office & Courthouse, Decatur, AL before Judge Abdul K Kallon. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 12/11/2020. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Publix Super Markets Inc. filed by Publix Super Markets Inc (Keith, Travis)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Publix Super Markets Inc from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 47-cv-2020-901078, filed by Publix Super Markets Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (MEB2)
|
|
Answer to Complaint deemed filed in the Circuit Court of Madison County on 8/31/2020. (MEB2)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young v. Publix Super Markets Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Publix Super Markets Inc | |
| Represented By: | Travis Ian Keith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tinia Young | |
| Represented By: | Muhammad Ibn Abdullah |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
