Rice v. Peters et al
Petitioner: Steven Durell Rice
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Kenneth Peters
Case Number: 5:2020cv02070
Filed: December 28, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Gray M Borden
Referring Judge: Madeline Hughes Haikala
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER - On January 29, 2021, the court ordered Respondents to appear and show cause in writing why the relief requested by the petitioner should not be granted. Doc. #6 . Although the time limitation set forth in that order has expired, Respondents have failed to comply. Respondents again are ORDERED to appear and respond within 20 days of the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 2/25/2021. (KEK)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - The respondents are ORDERED to appear and SHOW CAUSE in writing, within twenty-one (21) days from the entry date of this order, why the relief requested by the petitioner should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 1/29/2021. (KEK)
January 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER - Accordingly, the undersigned finds Petitioner is indigent and the motions to proceed in forma pauperis (docs. #2 , #4 ) are GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to file this action without prepayment of a fee. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 1/29/2021. (KEK)
January 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven Durell Rice. (KEK)
December 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - Petitioner Steven Durell Rice's petition is deficient for the reason indicated below. The petitioner must correct the deficient pleading within thirty (30) days from the entry date of this Order. Although the petitioner filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, he failed to file a certified copy of his prison account statements for the last six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 12/30/2020. (KEK)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven Durell Rice. (KEK)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Steven Durell Rice.(KEK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rice v. Peters et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kenneth Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Durell Rice
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?