Moody v. Beaty et al
Thomas F Moody |
Sgt Joshua J Beaty and Christopher L Collins |
5:2021cv00156 |
February 1, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Annemarie Carney Axon |
Gray M Borden |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - Although the plaintiff filed a new motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff has not complied with the court's order by including a certified copy of his prison account statements reflecting his average deposits and balances. For the reasons stated above, the court RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due by 3/29/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/15/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas F Moody. (KEK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - Plaintiff must file a new verified application to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a certified copy of prison account statements, such as a printed sheet showing "Average Inmate Deposit Balances," for the last six months. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 2/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP form)(KEK) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Thomas F Moody. (MEB2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joshua J Beaty, Christopher L Collins, filed by Thomas F Moody. (MEB2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.