Cole v. Scroggin et al
Tanesha Cole |
Jesse Scroggin and Logan Grant |
5:2021cv00163 |
February 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Logan Grant shall file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint by April 5, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on March 16, 2021. (HKM) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Motion is RIPE 3/16/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Logan Grant. (Canupp, David) |
Filing 5 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Jesse Scroggin - "Moved Left No Address". (BJL) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants by Clerk for service via certified mail. (BJL) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial. (BJL) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Tanesha Cole. (BJL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Tanesha Cole.(BJL) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3767747 (B4601111185). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Tanesha Cole.(BJL). (Sherrod, Henry) Modified on 2/3/2021 (BJL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.