Speck v. Collecto, Inc.
Shelia Speck |
Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA, a Massachusetts corporation |
5:2021cv00227 |
February 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Herman N Johnson |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 DISMISSAL ORDER: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, without costs to either party. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 3/30/21. (BJL) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shelia Speck (Philipps, David) |
Filing 9 ORDER: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Settlement, the court STAYS all current deadlines until April 30, 2021. The parties shall take appropriate action to perfect settlement by April 30, 2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 3/16/21. (BJL) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Shelia Speck of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Collecto, Inc. served on 3/12/2021, answer due 4/2/2021. (AHI) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Collecto, Inc. Mailed certified mail. (MEB2) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Shelia Speck (Sykstus, Ronald) |
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on February 12, 2021. (ADH) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David J. Philipps and Mary E. Philipps Motion is RIPE 2/12/2021. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Shelia Speck. (BJL) |
Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Shelia Speck. (BJL) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Collecto, Inc. filed by Shelia Speck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(BJL) |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3775800 (B4601111469). (Philipps, David) Modified on 2/17/2021 (BJL). |
PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3775805 (B4601111470). (Philipps, David) Modified on 2/17/2021 (BJL). |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3775797 (B4601111468). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Collecto, Inc. filed by Shelia Speck. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(BJL). (Philipps, David) Modified on 2/17/2021 (BJL). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Speck v. Collecto, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Collecto, Inc. d/b/a EOS CCA, a Massachusetts corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelia Speck | |
Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.