Speck v. Medicredit Inc
| Shelia Speck |
| Medicredit Inc |
| 5:2021cv00733 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER - Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. (Doc. #11 ). Although plaintiff's notice is self-executing, the Court enters this Order to ask the Clerk to please close the file. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 7/15/2021. (KEK)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Shelia Speck (Philipps, David) |
|
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER: Plantiff has filed a Notice of Settlement requesting a stay of all deadlines in order to finalize the settlement agreement. (Doc. #9 ). The Court grants plaintiff's request and stays all remaining deadlines in this action. On or before August 6, 2021, the parties shall please file a joint stipulation of dismissal or a joint report updating the Court on the status of the settlement. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 6/25/2021. (YMB)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Shelia Speck of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shelia Speck. Medicredit Inc served on 6/10/2021, answer due 7/1/2021. (MEB2) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Medicredit Inc. Sent via certified mail. (KEK) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of Shelia Speck (Sykstus, Ronald) |
|
Filing 5
HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/27/2021. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER: The Court grants Attorneys David J. Philipps' and Mary Elizabeth Philipps' motion for admission pro hac vice in this action. (Doc. #3 ). Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 5/27/2021. (YMB)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Appear pro hac vice by Shelia Speck. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Shelia Speck. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medicredit Inc, filed by Shelia Speck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(KEK) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3851505. (Philipps, David) |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number 1126-3851506. (Philipps, David) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3851503. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Medicredit Inc, filed by Shelia Speck. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(KEK). (Philipps, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Speck v. Medicredit Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Medicredit Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shelia Speck | |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
