Surles v. United States et al
Christopher Surles |
United States, US Secretary of State, US Special Counsel and US Attorney General |
5:2021cv00918 |
July 6, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Liles C Burke |
John H England |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS - The Court ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation, ADOPTS it as the findings of the Court, and DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 8/27/2021. (AHI) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - The Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute; objections to R&R due within 14 days from the entry date of the R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 8/9/2021. (AHI) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Christopher Surles (BJL) |
Filing 3 ORDER - Petitioner has 20 days from the entry date of this order to notify the court if he wishes to continue this action as a 42 U.S.C. 1983 action as more fully set out in order. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 7/9/2021. (AHI) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher Surles. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against US Attorney General, US Secretary of State, US Special Counsel, United States, filed by Christopher Surles.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.