Little v. Banks et al
Tommy Lee Little |
Banks and Carter |
5:2021cv00984 |
July 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Herman N Johnson |
Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SECOND NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING - The undersigned will afford the plaintiff another opportunity to correct the deficiency. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within 30 days from the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 9/1/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tommy Lee Little. (KEK) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING by Tommy Lee Little (Attachments: #1 envelope)(DNW) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient for the reason(s) indicated below. The plaintiff must correct the deficient pleading within 30 days from the entry date of this notice, in the manner explained below. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(PSM) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tommy Lee Little. (MEB2) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Banks, Carter, filed by Tommy Lee Little. (MEB2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.