Collins et al v. Mavis Tire Supply LLC
Kizzy Collins and D'Carlos Joiner |
Mavis Tire Supply LLC d/b/a Mavis Discount Tire |
5:2021cv01068 |
August 4, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Madeline Hughes Haikala |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mavis Tire Supply LLC.(Ward, Kimberly) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER: The Court grants defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time. (Doc. #5 ). Defendant Mavis Tire Supply LLC shall please respond to the Complaint on or before 9/20/2021. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/27/2021. (YMB) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading by Mavis Tire Supply LLC. (Ward, Kimberly) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D'Carlos Joiner, Kizzy Collins. Mavis Tire Supply LLC served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Mastando, Teresa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mavis Tire Supply LLC. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (KEK) |
Filing 2 HAIKALA CHAMBERS INITIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 8/4/2021. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mavis Tire Supply LLC, filed by D'Carlos Joiner, Kizzy Collins.(KEK) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3897764. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Mavis Tire Supply LLC, filed by D'Carlos Joiner, Kizzy Collins.(KEK). (Mastando, Teresa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.