Chaney v. Lee
| United States of America |
| Nekyle A Chaney |
| Floyd Lee |
| 5:2022cv00239 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #5 Order to Show Cause. The United States is ORDERED to respond on or before May 13, 2022.Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M. Borden on 04/13/2022. (SUH) Modified on 4/13/2022 (PSM).
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 Order to Show Cause by United States of America. (Saxon, John)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - the respondent is ORDERED to appear and show cause in writing in 30 days why the petition should not be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/14/2022. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Change of Address by Nekyle A Chaney (KAM)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 3/2/2022. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Nekyle A Chaney. (KEK)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nekyle A Chaney.(KEK)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
