Jurhs v. Huntsville, City of
| Holland Jurhs |
| Huntsville, City of |
| 5:2022cv00358 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #6 Motion for Extension of Time; The City's response to the plaintiffs complaint is due by June 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 05/04/2022. (AKD)
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Huntsville, City of answer due 6/15/2022. (AKD) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Huntsville, City of. (Canupp, David) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - The City of Huntsville's unopposed motion for an extension, doc. #4 , is GRANTED. The City's response to the plaintiff's complaint is due by May 16, 2022. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 4/14/2022. (KEK)
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Huntsville, City of. (Canupp, David) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Holland Jurhs. Huntsville, City of served on 3/24/2022, answer due 4/14/2022. (Goldfarb, Jon) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Huntsville, City of. Returned to Plaintiff for service. (AKD) |
| Filing fee: $ 402.00, receipt number B4601119176 (AKD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Huntsville, City of, filed by Holland Jurhs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit Right to Sue)(AKD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
