Peterson v. State Farm Insurance Co. et al
| Carlton Peterson |
| State Farm Insurance Co. and Ted Calvert |
| 5:2022cv00619 |
| May 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Abdul K Kallon |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER- The court is satisfied that this case meets the requirements for subject matter jurisdiction. In particular, the court observes that the insurance policy at issue provides potential coverage of $319,000 and that the complaint also seeks punitive damages. Consequently, this case may remain in federal court under 28 U.S.C. 1332. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 07/08/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 12
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Fawal, Aziz)
|
|
Filing 11
Brief re #10 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Parties' Joint Brief in Support of Diversity Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. 1332. (Fawal, Aziz)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 Motion to Withdraw Motion to Remand; In light of the court's need to assess whether it has subject matter jurisdiction, and because doubts about jurisdiction should be resolved in favor of remand, the court will review submissions from the parties on this issue before deciding if remand is required. Simultaneous briefs on this matter, not to exceed five pages each, are due by June 29, 2022.Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 06/21/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Dismiss Motion to Remand by Carlton Peterson. (Artrip, Eric)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 MOTION to Dismiss Claims against Ted Calvert; Peterson's claims against Calvert are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Calvert's motion to dismiss the claims against him, #3 , is DENIED as moot. Peterson's motion to remand, #6 remains pending. To the extent that State Farm opposes this motion, its response is due by June 21, 2022, and Peterson's reply, if any, is due by June 24, 2022. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 06/14/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Dismiss As to Fewer Than All Parties by Carlton Peterson. (Artrip, Eric)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Remand by Carlton Peterson. (Artrip, Eric) Modified on 6/21/2022 (AKD, ).
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEFING SCHEDULE re #3 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Ted Calvert; Plaintiff's response is due by May 27, 2022, defendant reply, if any, is due by June3, 2022. The parties are reminded of the briefing schedule outlined in Appendix attached hereto. Signed by Judge Abdul K Kallon on 05/19/2022. (AKD)
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4085367 (ALND receipt# B4601120240). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Insurance Co., Ted Calvert from Circuit Court of Cullman County AL, case number 25-CV-2022-900089.00., filed by State Farm Insurance Co., Ted Calvert. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(AKD). (Fawal, Aziz) Modified on 5/13/2022 (AKD).
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by Ted Calvert, State Farm Insurance Co. (AKD)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Ted Calvert by Ted Calvert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(AKD)
|
|
Filing 2
ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Ted Calvert, State Farm Insurance Co..(AKD)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Insurance Co., Ted Calvert from Circuit Court of Cullman County AL, case number 25-CV-2022-900089.00., filed by State Farm Insurance Co., Ted Calvert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(AKD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
