Duke v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc
| William Duke |
| Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee Corporation doing business as TCM Inc |
| 5:2022cv01529 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S MINUTE ENTRY OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and the voluntary dismissal of all claims in this action WITH PREJUDICE. This case is CLOSED. |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by William Duke (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Tennessee Credit Management Inc served on 12/19/2022, answer due 1/9/2023. (AHI) |
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER: Upon consideration of Plaintiffs notice of settlement, and for good cause shown, the Court STAYS this case and ORDERS Plaintiff to file either a joint stipulation of dismissal or a status report by January 20, 2023. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/19/22. (SPT )
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by William Duke of Settlement (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued b the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Tennessee Credit Management Inc. (AHI) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Mary Philipps and David Philipps. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 12/8/22. (SPT )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ronald C Sykstus on behalf of William Duke (Sykstus, Ronald) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4223302 (B-2593). related document #1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Tennessee Credit Management Inc filed by William Duke. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(AHI). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/5/2022 (AHI). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number AALNDC-4223306 (B-2594). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/5/2022 (AHI). |
| PHV Fee paid: $ 75, receipt number AALNDC-4223310 (B-2595). (Philipps, David) Modified on 12/5/2022 (AHI). |
| Filing 3 Request for service by certified mail filed by William Duke. (AHI) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Appear PHV for Mary Philipps and David Philipps by William Duke. (AHI) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Tennessee Credit Management Inc filed by William Duke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duke v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Duke | |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | Ronald C Sykstus |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee Corporation doing business as TCM Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
