Hightower v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: James Hightower
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 5:2023cv00258
Filed: March 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Liles C Burke
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEFING letter to counsel. (AHI)
April 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Social Security Administration, Commissioner. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 1, #6 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 2, #7 Non Disability Related Development, #8 Disability Related Development, #9 Medical Records)(Clark, Timothy)
April 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4311151 (B-4615). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner filed by James Hightower.(AHI). (Horner, Melissa) Modified on 4/5/2023 (AHI).
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court DENIES the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and the filing fee must be paid by 4/10/2023. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 4/4/2023. (AHI)
March 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Choi, Sarah)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack B Hood on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Hood, Jack)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Hightower. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application)(AHI)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner filed by James Hightower.(AHI)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Social Security Answer Deadline Social Security Administration, Commissioner served on 3/2/2023, answer due 5/1/2023. (AHI)
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order NOTICE that counsel for the plaintiff is required to provide the social security number of the plaintiff to the US Attorney's Office within 10 days. The notice is to be given to the US Attorney outside of the electronic filing system. (AHI)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hightower v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Hightower
Represented By: Melissa Boles Horner
Represented By: Timothy Harper Zanaty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Represented By: Jack B Hood
Represented By: Timothy Clark
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Choi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?