Davis v. Headley et al
Undral Sandor Davis |
Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
5:2023cv01251 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Staci G Cornelius |
R David Proctor |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT consistent with the accompanying memorandum opinion and with Rule 58 FRCP, this petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction. Costs are taxed as paid.. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/14/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 11/14/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 4 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Undral Sandor Davis filed by Undral Sandor Davis. (DNW) |
Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Undral Sandor Davis Objections to R&R due by 11/16/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 11/1/2023. (RMM) |
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number H-345 (KAM) |
Filing 2 ORDER The petitioner must file a verified application to proceed ifp within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/3/2023. (KAM) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Undral Sandor Davis.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.