Crespo v. Smart Health Diagnostics Company et al
| Carlo Crespo |
| Smart Health Diagnostics Company and Matthew Nunez |
| 5:2023cv01421 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue filed by Matthew Nunez, Smart Health Diagnostics Company. (Wynn, Jefferson) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Carlo Crespo, Matthew Nunez, Smart Health Diagnostics Company. (LCB) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue filed by Carlo Crespo. (Sipes, Jade) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Maia Fleischman on behalf of Carlo Crespo (Fleischman, Maia) |
Filing 9
ORDER: The Court GRANTS the #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' #4 Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Response is due by 12/4/2023, and any reply is due by 12/18/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/22/2023. (AHI)
|
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue Motion is RIPE 11/22/2023. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Carlo Crespo. (Sipes, Jade) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Plaintiff shall file a response to the motion within fourteen (14) days of the entry date of this order. Defendant shall file any reply within seven (7) days thereafter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/13/2023. (LCB)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: The Court SETS a Telephone Status Conference for December 14, 2023 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson Jr. Call in information will be provided to the parties separately. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/13/2023. (LCB)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: That the parties are required to enter an election regarding the exercise of jurisdiction by a magistrate judge no later than December 26, 2023; in the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is directed to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after December 26, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 11/13/2023. (LCB)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue by Matthew Nunez, Smart Health Diagnostics Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Wynn, Jefferson) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Joy Tidmore on behalf of Matthew Nunez, Smart Health Diagnostics Company (Tidmore, Emily) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number AALNDC-4453729 (b-8107). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Smart Health Diagnostics Company, Matthew Nunez from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 47-CV-2023-901046.00, filed by Smart Health Diagnostics Company, Matthew Nunez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(LCB). (Sansbury, Michael) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of assignment of case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial. (LCB) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Smart Health Diagnostics Company, Matthew Nunez from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 47-CV-2023-901046.00, filed by Smart Health Diagnostics Company, Matthew Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(LCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
