Davis v. Polaris Industries Inc et al
| Michael Davis |
| Polaris Industries Inc and Rachel McCrary |
| 5:2023cv01723 |
| December 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Liles C Burke |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Rachel McCrary. RTS UNCLAIMED NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED UNABLE TO FORWARD (AHI) |
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 1/25/24. (SPT)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Polaris Industries Inc. filed by Polaris Industries Inc (Bradford, Stacey) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Polaris Industries Inc.(Bradford, Stacey) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed Polaris Industries Inc served on 1/4/2024, answer due 1/25/2024. (AHI) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued by the clerk and delivered via certified mail for service as to Rachel McCrary and Polaris Industries Inc. (AHI) |
| Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number B-9209 (AHI) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Michael Davis of Request for Service by Certified Mail (Trueblood, Temple) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Michael Davis.(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
