Smith v. Windom et al
| Henry Clay Smith, . |
| Honorable Judge Mary B Windom and Jennifer M Howell |
| 5:2023cv01733 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Anna M Manasco |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 OBJECTION to #5 Report and Recommendations by Henry Clay Smith. (AKD) |
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Henry Clay Smith; For the foregoing reasons, the undersigned RECOMMENDS the court DENY Smith's motions to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. #2 ; doc. #4 ). Because Smith did not pay the filing and administrative fees of $405 when he filed his complaint, the undersigned FURTHER RECOMMENDS the court DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 02/06/2024. (AKD) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Henry Clay Smith. (AKD) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT against Jennifer M Howell, Mary B Windom, filed by Henry Clay Smith.(AKD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Henry Clay Smith. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jennifer M Howell, Mary B Windom, filed by Henry Clay Smith.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
