Whitaker et al v. 3M Company Inc et al
James G Whitaker, ., Cynthia Early, Jerry Early, LaCambria Draper, Leeann Craig, John Sterling and James G Whitaker |
3M Company Inc, Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc and Daikin America Inc |
5:2024cv00071 |
January 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Liles C Burke |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 MOTION to Stay Consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion To Remand Pending The Judicial Panel On Multidistrict Litigation's Final Decision Whether To Transfer This Case To The IN RE AFFF MDL by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Radney, W) Modified on 3/22/2024 (AHI). |
Filing 24 REPLY Brief filed by Plaintiffs Leeann Craig, LaCambria Draper, Cynthia Early, Jerry Early, John Sterling, James G Whitaker re: #15 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Leeann Craig, LaCambria Draper, Cynthia Early, Jerry Early, John Sterling, James G Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - SC Remand Order)(Randolph, Christopher) |
Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #15 MOTION to Remand to State Court Defendant 3Ms Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Remand filed by 3M Company Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Radney, W) |
Filing 22 TEXT ORDER: For good cause shown, the Court GRANTS the Defendants' #21 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants deadline by which to file their respective responses to Plaintiffs complaint is extended to twenty-one (21) days after the earlier of: i) a determinative ruling is entered on Plaintiffs motion to remand [Doc. 15]; or ii) a ruling from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation that this case should be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina for inclusion in the Multidistrict Litigation No. 2873.Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 02/26/2024. (SGS) |
Filing 21 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time PARTIES' JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT by Daikin America Inc. (DeBray, Thomas) |
Filing 20 ORDER: Defendants shall file a response to the motion to remand by 3/6/2024 and Plaintiffs shall file any reply by 3/20/2024. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 2/15/2024. (AHI) |
Filing 19 TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time. The deadline to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference is extended to June 21, 2024.Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 02/15/2024. (SGS) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew T Dukes on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Dukes, Matthew) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert V Wood, Jr on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Wood, Robert) |
Filing 16 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time PARTIES' JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND THEIR F.R.C.P. 26 DEADLINES by Daikin America Inc. (DeBray, Thomas) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Leeann Craig, LaCambria Draper, Cynthia Early, Jerry Early, John Sterling, James G Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Declaration of C. Randolph, #2 Exhibit Ex 2, #3 Exhibit Ex 3, #4 Exhibit Ex 4, #5 Exhibit Ex 5, #6 Exhibit Ex 6, #7 Exhibit Ex 7, #8 Exhibit Ex 8, #9 Exhibit Ex 9, #10 Exhibit Ex 10, #11 Exhibit Ex 11)(Randolph, Christopher) |
Filing 14 TEXT ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline to file a responsive pleading is set to March 18, 2024.Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 02/06/2024. (SGS) |
Filing 13 INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 2/6/24. (SPT ) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc. filed by Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc (Monroe, E) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Caleigh Miller Hart on behalf of Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc (Hart, Caleigh) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Toray Fluorofibers (America) Inc. (Monroe, E) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher S Randolph, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Randolph, Christopher) |
Filing 8 TEXT ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. For good cause shown, the deadline to file a response is extended to March 18, 2024. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 01/30/2024. (SGS) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. For good cause shown, the deadline to file a response is extended to March 18, 2024. Signed by Judge Liles C Burke on 01/30/2024. (SGS) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal by 3M Company Inc. (Radney, W) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Daikin America Inc. filed by Daikin America Inc (Yeilding, Christopher) |
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Daikin America Inc. (DeBray, Thomas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher L Yeilding on behalf of Daikin America Inc (Yeilding, Christopher) |
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4511864 (B-9662). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Morgan County, Alabama, case number 52-cv-2024-900012 filed by 3M Company Inc. (With JURY DEMAND in state complaint) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(AHI). (Radney, W) Modified on 1/24/2024 (AHI). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Corporate Disclosure by 3M Company Inc (AHI) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by 3M Company Inc from Circuit Court of Morgan County, Alabama, case number 52-cv-2024-900012 filed by 3M Company Inc. (With JURY DEMAND in state complaint) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(AHI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.