Somerville v. Limestone County Sheriffs Department et al
| Fred Somerville |
| Limestone County Sheriffs Department, Mike Blakely and Joey |
| 5:2024cv00220 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Nicholas A Danella |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons stated within, this report RECOMMENDS that the court DISMISS this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE based on Somerville's failure to prosecute. The plaintiff may file specific written objections within 14 days. Objections to R&R due by 5/1/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 4/17/2024. (MEB2) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay an initial partial filing fee of $45.33, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas A Danella on 3/6/2024. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fred Somerville. (KAM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mike Blakely, Joey, Limestone County Sheriffs Department, filed by Fred Somerville.(KAM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
