Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Northern District Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation

Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation

Plaintiff:	Phillip Eggelston
Defendant:	Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Case Number:	6:2010cv02290
Filed:	August 23, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Jasper Office
County:	Jefferson
Presiding Judge:	John E Ott
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 4, 2016	Filing 37 ORDER that the report and recommendation is due to be adopted and accepted in part and reversed in part.The Court is of the opinion that the new case should be randomly assigned in accordance with the Courts internal operating procedures;Marshall Dur bins Motion to Vacate Arbitrators Award or in the Alternative, Motion to Reinstate CV 10-2290 and Vacate (doc. 21) is hereby DENIED IN PART, specifically to the extent that it asks the Court to reinstate this closed civil action that was dismissed on June 21, 2012. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to open a new case with a new case number, randomly assign it in accordance with the Courts internal operating procedures, and refile Marshall Durbins pending motion (doc. 21) as the initial pleading in the new case, as an application to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 2/4/2016. (KAM, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 4, 2016

Filing 37 ORDER that the report and recommendation is due to be adopted and accepted in part and reversed in part.The Court is of the opinion that the new case should be randomly assigned in accordance with the Courts internal operating procedures;Marshall Dur bins Motion to Vacate Arbitrators Award or in the Alternative, Motion to Reinstate CV 10-2290 and Vacate (doc. 21) is hereby DENIED IN PART, specifically to the extent that it asks the Court to reinstate this closed civil action that was dismissed on June 21, 2012. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to open a new case with a new case number, randomly assign it in accordance with the Courts internal operating procedures, and refile Marshall Durbins pending motion (doc. 21) as the initial pleading in the new case, as an application to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 9. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 2/4/2016. (KAM, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Eggelston
Represented By:	Daniel E Arciniegas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?