Driver et al v. W E Pegues Inc et al
Plaintiff: Clyde Driver and Teresa Driver
Defendant: W E Pegues Inc, Robert Gregory Pegues, William Edward Pegues, III and Sammy Lansdell
Intervenor: State Auto Property & Casualty Company
Case Number: 6:2011cv01374
Filed: April 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
County: Lamar
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 103 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/19/12. (KGE, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Driver et al v. W E Pegues Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor: State Auto Property & Casualty Company
Represented By: Judith E Dolan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clyde Driver
Represented By: H Gregory Pearson
Represented By: Samuel W Junkin
Represented By: Charles E Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Driver
Represented By: H Gregory Pearson
Represented By: Samuel W Junkin
Represented By: Charles E Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W E Pegues Inc
Represented By: David T Gordon
Represented By: Joseph L Kerr, Jr
Represented By: Christopher J Zulanas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Gregory Pegues
Represented By: David T Gordon
Represented By: Joseph L Kerr, Jr
Represented By: Christopher J Zulanas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Edward Pegues, III
Represented By: David T Gordon
Represented By: Joseph L Kerr, Jr
Represented By: Christopher J Zulanas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sammy Lansdell
Represented By: David T Gordon
Represented By: Joseph L Kerr, Jr
Represented By: Christopher J Zulanas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?