Bailey v. Anderson Merchandiser LP

Plaintiff: Shannon Bailey
Defendant: Anderson Merchandiser LP
Case Number: 6:2012cv02806
Filed: August 24, 2012
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Jasper Office
County: Walker
Presiding Judge: Robert R Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 4, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, as set out, ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 of the Magistrate Judge, and therefore ORDERS that Pla's 4 Motion for Remand is DENIED. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 2/14/13. (CTS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Anderson Merchandiser LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Bailey
Represented By: Byron G McMath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anderson Merchandiser LP
Represented By: John A Earnhardt
Represented By: Evan P Moltz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?