Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Plaintiff: Phillip Eggelston
Defendant: Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Case Number: 6:2016cv00217
Filed: February 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Jasper Office
County: Walker
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 0010
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 8/11/2016. (AVC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eggelston v. Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Phillip Eggelston
Represented By: Daniel E Arciniegas
Represented By: Jon C Goldfarb
Represented By: L William Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marshall Durbin Food Corporation
Represented By: William K Hancock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?