Hunt v. Walker County Jail et al
| Anthony G Hunt, Jr |
| Sheriff Jim Underwood, Chief Daren Bridges, Preemptive Health Solutions and Walker County Jail |
| 6:2018cv01409 |
| August 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| John E Ott |
| C Lynwood Smith |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time; Plaintiff is allowed until November 1, 2018, in which to pay his initial partial filing fee of $11.75. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 10/01/18. (SPT )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to pay partial filing fee by Anthony G Hunt, Jr. (AHI) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER CONSENT FORM by Anthony G Hunt, Jr (AHI) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay an initial partial filing fee of $11.75, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 9/4/2018. (AHI)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anthony G Hunt, Jr. (KEK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Daren Bridges, Preemptive Health Solutions, Jim Underwood, Walker County Jail, filed by Anthony G Hunt, Jr.(KEK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
