Stacy Decorte v. Drive-In of Evansville Inc
AY and Stacy Decorte |
Drive-In of Evansville Inc |
6:2018cv01701 |
October 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
T Michael Putnam |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Stacy Decorte. filed by Stacy Decorte (Hardin, Charles) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/6/2018: #1 Supplement Stipulation of Dismissal (Redacted)) (MRR, ). Modified- Sealed document at the direction of chambers. Redacted document and filed as attachment to main document on 12/6/2018 (MRR, ). |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Drive-In of Evansville Inc, filed by Stacy Decorte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - A.Y. EEOC Charge, #2 Exhibit B - A.Y. Right to Sue Letter)(Hardin, Charles) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER The complaint contains information that personally identifies the plaintiff. In the interest of privacy, the clerk is DIRECTED to seal the complaint. The plaintiff is hereby given 7 days to file an Amended Complaint that redacts the plaintiff's personal identifiers. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on November 30, 2018. (TNC) |
Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number B4601092839. (KEK) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Drive-In of Evansville Inc, filed by AY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(MRR, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.