Long v. Underwood et al
| John Long |
| Braden Miles, Sheriff of Walker Co James E Underwood and James E Underwood |
| 6:2019cv00695 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| T Michael Putnam |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Fred Lee Clements, Jr on behalf of All Defendants (Clements, Fred) |
Filing 15
TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 06/26/2019. (Borden, Gray)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Deadline by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Brown, Todd) Modified text on 6/25/2019 (MRR, ). |
|
Filing 13
TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 6/19/2019. (Borden, Gray)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 Response in Opposition to Motion by John Long. (Diamond, Seth) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Dismiss and Strike filed by John Long. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - ACCA Liability Fund, #2 Exhibit B - About ACCA)(Diamond, Seth) Modified text on 6/19/2019 (MRR, ). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT - The above-styled civil action has been reassigned to the Honorable Gray M. Borden. Magistrate Judge Borden will be presiding over the caseload of former Magistrate Judge T. Michael Putnam. Please use case number 6:19-695-GMB on all subsequent pleadings. (KEK) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER re #5 Motion to Dismiss. Any response to the motion is due on or before June 18, 2019. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on or before June 25, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on June 4, 2019. (TNC)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by James E Underwood. filed by James E Underwood (Brown, Todd) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Braden Miles. filed by Braden Miles (Brown, Todd) |
| Filing 6 Brief re #5 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Brown, Todd) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Brown, Todd) |
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time and giving 7 additional days to respond. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on May 14, 2019. (TNC)
|
| Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Motion is RIPE 5/14/2019. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Brown, Todd) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Braden Miles, James E Underwood from Circuit Court of Walker County, case number 64-cv-2019-900131., filed by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits for Removal, #2 SJIS Exhibits for removal)(MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3341136 (B4601097467). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Braden Miles, James E Underwood from Circuit Court of Walker County, case number 64-cv-2019-900131., filed by Braden Miles, James E Underwood. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits for Removal, # 2 SJIS Exhibits for removal)(MRR, ). (Brown, Todd) Modified on 5/8/2019 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
