White v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC
| Christopher White |
| Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC doing business as Swift Transportation |
| 6:2019cv00730 |
| May 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Release of 911 Audio Records. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/2/2019. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Before the Court is Defendant's Motion for Protective Order Or, in the Alternative, Motion to Quash. #10 The motion #10 is DENIED. However, the Court expects that Plaintiff will pay the costs any non-party incurs as a result of Plaintiffs discovery request. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/2/2019. (PSM)
|
|
Filing 12
QUALIFIED HIPAA PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/2/2019. (PSM)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Release of 911 Audio Records by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC. (Richmond, Lea) |
| NOTICE of RESETTING Hearing: Scheduling Conference RESET for 7/16/2019 at 1:00 PM in Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. (PSM) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Protective Order or, in the alternative,, MOTION to Quash by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Richmond, Lea) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Protective Order by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC. (Richmond, Lea) |
| Filing 8 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Fulk, Joseph) |
| NOTICE SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: Scheduling Conference set for 6/26/2019 at 11:00 AM in chambers, Federal Building, Tuscaloosa, AL before Judge L Scott Coogler. At least one attorney for each party must attend the conference in person.(PSM) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC of Constitutional Challenge (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Richmond, Lea) |
|
Filing 6
UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/29/2019. (PSM)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dennis Oscar Vann on behalf of Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC (Vann, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC.(Richmond, Lea) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona d/b/a Swift Transportation, c/o National Registerd Agents, Inc - Jennifer Lockwood on 05/15/19, filed by Christopher White. (Fulk, Joseph) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC; del to pla for service. (KWC) |
| Filing Fee received from Joseph Andrew Fulk in the amount of $400.00, credit card receipt_number 1126-3345685; USDC receipt number B4601097671; related document #1 COMPLAINT against Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, filed by Christopher White.(PSM) (Additional attachments added on 5/13/2019: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet and Attachment A) (KWC). (Fulk, Joseph) Modified on 5/14/2019 (KWC) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona LLC, filed by Christopher White.(PSM) (Additional attachments added on 5/13/2019: #1 Civil Cover Sheet and Attachment A) (KWC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
