Darty v. Smith et al
| Jackie R. Darty |
| Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Nick Smith |
| 6:2019cv01450 |
| September 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Karon O Bowdre |
| John E Ott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jackie R. Darty. Objections to R&R due within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date the Report and Recommendation is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 10/31/2019. (JLC) |
Filing 4
ORDER that within twenty (20) days from the entry date of this Order, Petitioner is to notify the Court whether he wishes to (1) continue with this Habeas action and correct the deficiencies identified herein or (2) dismiss this action and file a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. If Petitioner fails to notify the Court of his intentions within the allotted time, this action may be dismissed without further notice for want of prosecution. Signed by Magistrate Judge John E Ott on 10/2/2019. (JLC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of filing: letter to the court by Jackie R. Darty. (KEK) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jackie R. Darty. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jackie R. Darty.(JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
