May v. Juul Labs Inc et al
Chad Landon May |
Meo Inc, E-Juice Vapor Inc, Shenzhen IVPS Technology Corporation LTD, Mighty Vapors LLC, Carter Elixirs Inc, Buckshot Vapors Inc, Marina Vape LLC, Dash Vapes Inc, Juul Labs Inc, Black Note Inc, Direct Vapor LLC, Phillip Rocke LLC, Vaping Rabbit LLC, The, Kilo E-Liquids Inc, Hookah Imports Inc, Mig Vapor LLC, Vape Wild LLC, Schwartz E-Liquid LLC and Holdfast Vapors LLC |
6:2019cv01794 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
L Scott Coogler |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER Transferring Case to MDL 2913: ORDER of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the Northern District of California for inclusion in MDL 2913; certified copy of docket entries and documents requested by transferee clerk emailed to Clerk of Court in Northern District of California. (PSM) |
Filing 3 ORDER REINSTATING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (PSM) |
Filing 2 ORDER Transferring Case to MDL 2913: ORDER of Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferring this case to the Northern District of California for inclusion in MDL 2913; certified copy of docket entries and documents requested by transferee clerk emailed to Clerk of Court in Northern District of California. (PSM) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Chad Landon May.(PSM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.