Viator v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Tracy Viator
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 6:2022cv01518
Filed: December 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Presiding Judge: Herman N Johnson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathaniel J Heber on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Heber, Nathaniel)
January 26, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE by Social Security Administration, Commissioner of Filing Certified Transcript (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 1, #6 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 2, #7 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices Part 3, #8 Non Disability Related Development, #9 Disability Related Development, #10 Medical Records Part 1, #11 Medical Records Part 2, #12 Medical Records Part 3, #13 Medical Records Part 4, #14 Medical Records Part 5, #15 Medical Records Part 6, #16 Medical Records Part 7, #17 Medical Records Part 8, #18 Medical Records Part 9, #19 Medical Records Part 10)(Heber, Nathaniel)
December 6, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda Meredith Donat on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Donat, Amanda)
December 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: The Court GRANTS #2 the Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 12/2/2022. (LCB)
December 2, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah Elizabeth Choi on behalf of Social Security Administration, Commissioner (Choi, Sarah)
December 1, 2022 Social Security Answer Deadline, Answer due 1/30/2023. (CTF)
December 1, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Motion is RIPE 12/1/2022. Any party may file a motion to reconsider within three (3) business days of a ruling on the motion.Filed by Tracy Viator. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit IFP)(LCB)
December 1, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration, Commissioner filed by Tracy Viator.(LCB)
December 1, 2022 NOTICE that counsel for the Plaintiff is required to pride the social security number of the plaintiff to the US Attorney's Office within 10 days. The notice is to be given to the US Attorney outside of the electronic filing system. (LCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Viator v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Viator
Represented By: Robert O Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Represented By: Amanda Meredith Donat
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Choi
Represented By: Nathaniel J Heber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?