Carr v. Davis et al
| Roger Lee Carr |
| Gwendolyn Davis, Steve Marshall and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The |
| 6:2023cv00744 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Annemarie Carney Axon |
| Herman N Johnson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number B-6593 (KAM)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Denying #4 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, petitioner to pay full filing fee of $5 within 30 days, failing which the case may be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 7/17/2023. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Roger Lee Carr. (JLC)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER The #1 petition stands deficient for the following reason as set out. The petitioner must correct the deficiency within 30 days. The Clerk is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the form application to proceed in forma pauperis on the petitioner along with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Herman N Johnson, Jr on 6/9/2023. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 2
CLERK'S NOTICE re: case number as to Roger Lee Carr. (KSS)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Roger Lee Carr.(KSS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
