Oates v. Alabama, State of et al
| Noah J Oates |
| Alabama, State of and White |
| 6:2023cv00951 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| R David Proctor |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER If Oates wishes to pursue a federal habeas claim for excessive bail,he is ORDERED, within 30 calendar days, to file an amended petitionby completing the attached 2241 form, consistent with theinstructions provided in this order. Any amended petition SHALL beaccompanied by either the $5.00 filing fee or a verified, completed IFPmotion. If Oates does not file a timely amended petition, the court maydismiss this matter without further notice for failure to prosecute. If Oates wishes to pursue conditions of confinement claims, he SHALL complete and file the attached 1983 complaint form. Any 1983 complaint SHALL be accompanied by either: (1) fees in the amount of $402; or (2) a verified, completed IFPmotion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 8/8/2023. (KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Petitioner of Case number mailed by first class mail. (RMM)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Noah J Oates.(KAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
