Mathis v. Stewart
| Michael Mathis |
| Jonathan Stewart doing business as Stewart Roofing |
| 6:2023cv01709 |
| December 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Gray M Borden |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE to remind parties of consent conference scheduled at 9:45 a.m. on February 21, 2024; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, the conference will be cancelled. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 2/13/2024. (RMM) |
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 1/23/2024. (RMM)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Pursuant to the General Order for Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than March 8, 2024. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reassign the case to a randomly drawn district judge without further order after March 8, 2024. A telephone conference is SET for 9:45 a.m. on February 21, 2024. The parties are DIRECTED to dial 205-931-0422 no less than five minutes before the status conference begins. The phone conference ID is 862 317 553. The telephone conference will be cancelled by separate order if all parties submit forms 24 hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gray M Borden on 1/23/2024. (RMM)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Jonathan Stewart. (RMM) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Jonathan Stewart served on 1/2/2024, answer due 1/23/2024. (DNW) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jonathan Stewart via certified mail. (RMM) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4492467/ALND receipt B-9161. related document #1 COMPLAINT against Jonathan Stewart, filed by Michael Mathis.(RMM). (Arnold, Allen) Modified on 12/20/2023 (RMM). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Disclosure by Michael Mathis. (RMM) |
| Filing 2 Request for service by certified mail filed by Michael Mathis. (RMM) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jonathan Stewart, filed by Michael Mathis.(RMM) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mathis v. Stewart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Mathis | |
| Represented By: | Allen Durham Arnold |
| Represented By: | Whitney Morgan Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jonathan Stewart doing business as Stewart Roofing | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
