Unterlechner v. M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC
| Sandra Unterlechner |
| M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC |
| 6:2024cv00046 |
| January 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jud Clifford Stanford on behalf of All Defendants (Stanford, Jud) |
Filing 10
UNIFORM INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - with appendices attached. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 2/20/2024. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC.(Stanford, Jud) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER - The Court acknowledges receipt of Plaintiff's response to this Court's January 22, 2024, Show Cause Order (Docs. #5 , #7 ). This Court is satisfied that Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged diversity jurisdiction. Defendant may challenge the accuracy of Plaintiff's jurisdictional allegations upon appearance in this action, if appropriate. Plaintiff is instructed to proceed prosecuting her claims. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/26/2024. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause filed by Sandra Unterlechner. (Martin, Ramon) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC. Mailed certified mail. (CLD) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER - Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/22/2024. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 4 Request for service by certified mail filed by Sandra Unterlechner. (Martin, Ramon) |
| Filing 3 RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause filed by Sandra Unterlechner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 - LLC Certificate of Formation)(Martin, Ramon) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 405, receipt_number AALNDC-4508632 (B9585). related document #1 COMPLAINT against M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC, filed by Sandra Unterlechner. (MEB2). (Martin, Ramon) Modified on 1/19/2024 (MEB2). |
|
Filing 2
ORDER - Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 1/17/2024. (MEB2)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC, filed by Sandra Unterlechner. (MEB2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Unterlechner v. M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sandra Unterlechner | |
| Represented By: | Ramon Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: M6 Hospitality Group Operating LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jud Clifford Stanford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
