Smith v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc et al

Plaintiff: Naomi Smith
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA Inc and Buchanan Hardwood Flooring LLC
Case Number: 7:2011cv02311
Filed: June 28, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Pickens
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2003
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naomi Smith
Represented By: Cynthia F Wilkinson
Represented By: Larry R Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Securitas Security Services USA Inc
Represented By: J Carin Pendergraft
Represented By: Katherine E Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Buchanan Hardwood Flooring LLC
Represented By: Bradley J Smith
Represented By: Cynthia Norman Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?