Parker v. Thomas et al
| Randolph Wayne Parker, Jr |
| Willie Thomas, John Hutton, Thomas Butler, Ann Marie Fulgham, Kim Thomas and Neicko White |
| staff attorney |
| 7:2012cv03503 |
| October 2, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Western Office |
| Bibb |
| Robert R Armstrong |
| R David Proctor |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER in accordance with memorandum opinion, dfts' special report (doc # 28 ) is construed as a motion for summary judgment (doc # 39 ) which is DENIED; this action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 7/18/14. (ASL)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER-re: R&R 8 . The court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the Recommendation is ACCEPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that all of Pltf's claims in this ac tion, except the excessive force claim against Dfts White, Butler, and Fulgham, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The excessive force claim against Dfts White, Butler, and Fulgham is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/18/2013. (AVC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
