Atlaco, LLC et al v. Caterpillar, Inc. et al
| Argonaut Insurance Company and Atlaco, LLC |
| D & B Puckett Machinery Company and Caterpillar, Inc. |
| 7:2013cv00689 |
| April 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Western Office |
| Tuscaloosa |
| R David Proctor |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
ORDER -In accordance with the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal #21 , the court hereby ORDERS that this action shall be, and is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/26/2015. (AVC)
|
| Filing 21 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company. filed by Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company (Mcglinchey, Deirdre) |
|
Filing 20
TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Defendants Motion to Enforce Settlement #19 , filed on May 27, 2014. The court attempted to set up an impromptu conference call to discuss the Motion #19 , but was unable to secure the participation of all parties. However, in light of the time-sensitive nature of the issue, the court sees fit to rule on the Motion #19 without further delay: for good cause shown, the Motion #19 is GRANTED. The parties SHALL file final settlement paperwork on or before June 2, 2014. In the event that the parties fail to meet this extended deadline, they are REQUIRED to show good cause for their delay. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 5/28/2014. (AVC)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Settlement Enforcement by Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company. (Crowder, A) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER OF DISMISSAL-The court, having been informed that a settlement has been reached, DISMISSES this case WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties are DIRECTED to submit a joint stipulation of dismissal once all settlement documentation is complete, but not later than sixty (60) days from the entry date of this Order. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 3/27/2014. (AVC)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Curtis Farrington on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Farrington, Lauren) |
|
Filing 16
TEXT ORDER - Before the court is Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Interrogatories (Doc. #15), filed on October 16, 2013. For good cause shown, the Motion (Doc. #15) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs SHALL respond to Defendants interrogatories on or before November 7, 2013. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 10/17/2013. (AVC)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery by Argonaut Insurance Company, Atlaco, LLC. (Williams, Matthew) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Counsel by Deirdre C Mcglinchey on behalf of Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company (Mcglinchey, Deirdre) Modified on 10/1/2013 (AVC). |
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER that all deadlines apply as further set out: Mediation in 5/2014; Discovery due by 5/23/2014; Dispositive Motions due by 6/10/2014; Pretrial conference ready in 10/2014; This case will be trial ready in 11/2014. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/23/2013. (AVC)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER-re: Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #11 . The motion is CONDITIONALLY GRANTED. By 9/27/2013, Attorney McGlinchey SHALL comply with Order as set out. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/23/2013. (AVC)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge R David Proctor: Scheduling Conference held on 9/23/2013. A separate Scheduling Order will be entered by the court. (KLL) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear counsel pro hac vice by Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Mcglinchey, Deirdre) |
| PHV Fee paid: $50, Receipt# 1126-2015186 (ALND# B4601046985). (Mcglinchey, Deirdre) Modified on 9/24/2013 (AVC). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE for 9/23/2013 at 9:00a.m., in chambers of the undersigned located at the Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse, Room 730. As counsel for dfts are locted in Tuscaloosa, he may participate in the conference via telephone. The court will initiate the call. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 9/4/2013. (AVC)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Crowder, A) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by D & B Puckett Machinery Company.(Crowder, A) |
|
Filing 7
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS w/ Appendix I & II attached. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 4/15/13. (CTS, )
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by D & B Puckett Machinery Company. filed by D & B Puckett Machinery Company (Crowder, A) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Caterpillar, Inc. filed by Caterpillar, Inc. (Crowder, A) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF CONSENT TO REMOVAL OF CASE TO FEDERAL COURT by D & B Puckett Machinery Company. (Crowder, A) Modified on 4/15/2013 (CVA). |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Caterpillar, Inc.(Crowder, A) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT. (JLC) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Caterpillar, Inc. from Tuscaloosa County Circuit Court, case number 63-CV-2013-900314.00., filed by Caterpillar, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(JLC) |
| COMPLAINT against Caterpillar, Inc., D & B Puckett Machinery Company, filed by Atlaco, LLC, Argonaut Insurance Company. (Deemed filed 3/15/2013 in the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County, attached to the Notice of Removal as Exhibit A.) (JLC) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
