Jenkins v. Tuscaloosa City Board of Education

Plaintiff: Janice R Jenkins
Defendant: Tuscaloosa City Board of Education
Case Number: 7:2013cv00977
Filed: May 22, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 9, 2014 41 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION re Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 28 . A separate order in accordance with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 12/9/14. (CTS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jenkins v. Tuscaloosa City Board of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tuscaloosa City Board of Education
Represented By: W David Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice R Jenkins
Represented By: John D Saxon
Represented By: Margaret Goldthwaite Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?