Richardson v. Alagasco, Inc.

Richardson v. Alagasco, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Andrew G. Richardson
Defendant:	Alagasco, Inc.
Case Number:	7:2013cv01950
Filed:	October 21, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office:	Western Office
County:	Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge:	Harwell G Davis
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 30, 2015	Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 6/30/2015. (PSM)
July 21, 2014	Filing 7 PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the Magistrate's Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft's Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED as to (1) pla's claim of retaliation pursuant to Title VII, (2) pla's claim of reta liation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, (3) pla's claims of race discrimination pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and (4) pla's claims of hostile work environment or racially hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Such claims hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that dft's Motion to Dismiss hereby is DENIED as to pla's claim of retaliation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 based on denial of overtime. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/20/14. (CTS, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 30, 2015

Filing 22 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 6/30/2015. (PSM)

July 21, 2014

Filing 7 PARTIAL DISMISSAL ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the Magistrate's Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Dft's Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED as to (1) pla's claim of retaliation pursuant to Title VII, (2) pla's claim of reta liation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981, (3) pla's claims of race discrimination pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and (4) pla's claims of hostile work environment or racially hostile work environment pursuant to Title VII and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Such claims hereby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that dft's Motion to Dismiss hereby is DENIED as to pla's claim of retaliation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 based on denial of overtime. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 7/20/14. (CTS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Alagasco, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew G. Richardson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Alagasco, Inc.
Represented By:	Anne Knox Averitt
Represented By:	Anne R Yuengert
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?