Hicks v. Tuscaloosa, City of

Plaintiff: Stephanie Hicks
Defendant: Tuscaloosa, City of
Case Number: 7:2013cv02063
Filed: November 12, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Western Office
County: Tuscaloosa
Presiding Judge: T Michael Putnam
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29:2601
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2016 86 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 3/25/2016. (AVC)
October 19, 2015 44 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 10/19/15. (MRR )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Tuscaloosa, City of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Hicks
Represented By: Patricia A Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tuscaloosa, City of
Represented By: Christopher L McIlwain
Represented By: James P Woodson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?