Smitherman et al v. Iguana Grill Inc
||Corey Smitherman and Jose Rico
||Iguana Grill Inc
||September 17, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
||John H England
|Nature of Suit:
||Fair Labor Standards Act
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 201
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 29, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION - The court finds plaintiffs FLSA claims represent a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions and the parties settlement is a fair and reasonable resolution of these bona fide disputes. Therefore, the parties Supplemental Joint Notice of Settlement and Request for Approval, (doc. 60), is GRANTED, and the settlement is APPROVED. A separate order will be entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 9/29/2017. (KEK)
|July 7, 2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - Having now carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the Court is of the opinion that the report is due to be and hereby is ADOPTED , and the recommendation is ACCEPTED (doc. 20 ), as amended by the magistrate judges order of June 17, 2015 (doc. 22 ). Consequently, the parties joint motion for approval of collective class notification (doc. 19 ), as well as their joint motion to amend same (doc. 21 ), are hereby GRANTED. This action is to remain assigned to the magistrate judge for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion and order. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/7/2015. (KEK)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?