Armstrong v. Sessions et al
| Reshawn Armstrong |
| Jeff Sessions, Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 7:2017cv01857 |
| November 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Western Office |
| Pickens |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Defendant's Bill of Cost/Tax Cost Pending Appeal 111 is DENIED. Furthermore, the Court makes no reduction to the $1464.60 requested in Defendant's Bill of Costs. The Court ORDERS the award of costs in this amount. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/22/2020. (PSM)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 3/3/2020. (PSM)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 5/6/2019. (PSM)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - For the reasons stated above, Defendant's Motion (doc. 12) is granted in part and denied in part, claims arising out of the 2015 Complaint based upon race are dismissed, while those arising out of the 2017 EEO Complaint based upon race may proceed. Plaintiff's Motion to Deny Defendant's Partial Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (doc. 15) is denied. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 7/9/2018. (KEK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
