Sprowl v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. Inernational Inc.
Plaintiff: Reginald Eric Sprowl
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz U.S. Inernational Inc.
Case Number: 7:2018cv00446
Filed: March 21, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Office: Western Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: L Scott Coogler
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION. Signed by Judge L Scott Coogler on 9/20/2019. (PSM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprowl v. Mercedes-Benz U.S. Inernational Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Eric Sprowl
Represented By: Roderick T Cooks
Represented By: Lee David Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mercedes-Benz U.S. Inernational Inc.
Represented By: Michael L Lucas
Represented By: Matthew T Scully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?